Mariana Marques (Grasp's scholar in European Union Regulation on the Faculty of Regulation of the College of Minho)
Introduction
In follow, monetary establishments usually grant credit score with out analysing the buyer’s creditworthiness. Generally, credit score is granted with out analysing any variant that might compromise the debtors’ monetary capability – and that is significantly prevalent within the granting of bank cards. Thus, any particular person can receive a bank card from most organisations with out having to offer important knowledge, similar to their wage slip, for instance. With out prejudice to the buyer’s duty to take out credit score that’s acceptable to their earnings, would shopper credit score establishments not have any obligation on this regard?
On 11 January 2024,[1] the Court docket of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) handed down a ruling by which it clarified the obligation to analyse the buyer’s creditworthiness –imposed on monetary establishments earlier than granting shopper credit score. This pre-contractual obligation, which is usually (and unduly) brushed apart by the entities chargeable for it, has been the topic of vital developments within the new legislation governing shopper credit score – Directive 2023/2225 of 18 October 2023.
This obligation imposed on monetary establishments goals to fulfil the target of elevated shopper safety, as they’re the weakest social gathering within the contractual relationship.[2] The purpose is subsequently to fight indebtedness and over-indebtedness, that are more and more frequent and really damaging to customers, credit score establishments and, in the end, the state. To this finish, the European Union (EU) has been legislating to guard customers on the pre-contractual stage, with a purpose to forestall irresponsible lending.
Nevertheless, it’s not sufficient to stipulate the duties of monetary organisations for them to truly adjust to them, since sufficiently dissuasive, acceptable and proportionate sanctions should be outlined. To this finish, the purpose of this text is to analyse the principles relevant within the EU relating to shopper safety within the credit score market – and, specifically, the obligation to analyse creditworthiness – in addition to to evaluate whether or not the actions of credit score establishments in Portugal can be suitable with European requirements relating to the accountable granting of shopper credit score.
Particular laws on shopper credit score: course of evolution
Even earlier than the creation of the Financial and Financial Union (EMU), the mission for which got here from the Delors Fee (1988-1989), Directive 87/102/EEC was launched on 22 December 1986,[3] the purpose of which was to harmonise the laws of the varied Member States on shopper credit score guidelines. This was a daring objective, since with a purpose to shield customers’ financial pursuits, it was essential to harmonise normal credit score situations and go on all info referring to credit score to the borrower.
Nevertheless, it turned out that variations endured on this space between the legal guidelines of the Member States.[4] This disparity may result in discrimination towards sure residents to the detriment of others, because it posed obstacles to the interior market. Consequently, entry to cross-border credit score was very troublesome.
Moreover, as a result of improve within the quantity of credit score granted to customers, the issue of indebtedness turned alarming.[5] The European Fee subsequently proposed an adaptation and, making an allowance for the place of the European Financial and Social Committee,[6] the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union accredited Directive 2008/48/EC on 23 April 2008.
The first goal of this directive was to harmonise the project of credit score within the numerous Member States, permitting for an efficient inner credit score market. Thus, Member States had been tasked to adapt their inner laws with the purpose of attaining harmonisation and, alternatively, had a (damaging) obligation to chorus from adopting new provisions past what was offered for within the talked about directive.[7] This directive already foresaw the necessity to shield customers from abuses by credit score establishments.
It is usually vital to emphasize that it was essential for credit score establishments to examine the creditworthiness of customers, with a purpose to forestall irresponsible lending that can result in default. This directive was transposed into Portuguese legislation by Decree-Regulation no. 133/2009, of two June.[8]
Present state of affairs: (EU) Directive 2023/2225
The efforts made by the beforehand talked about laws, though legitimate and vital, proved to be inadequate, given the likelihood they left to the Member States to undertake divergent provisions, thus failing to materialise the interior credit score market.
This legislative discrepancy jeopardised the interior market, for the reason that situations for entry to credit score weren’t the identical for all EU residents.[9] Consequently, there was a necessity to alter this example and Directive 2023/2225 of 18 October 2023 got here into being.[10]
The primary goal of the brand new Client Credit score Directive is to extend the transparency and safety of the EU credit score market, making an allowance for the present social panorama. This goal emphasises the related function of European citizenship within the present context of the Union, with the citizen as the primary protagonist.[11] To this finish, it prioritises right, clear and exact info for customers on behalf of credit score establishments in regard to the contractual situations established in credit score agreements.
On this manner, customers will have the ability to make knowledgeable choices about their finances administration, stopping unawareness which, in consequence, often results in non-fulfilment of contractual obligations. With the introduction of the brand new Client Credit score Directive, the vary of its software has been prolonged to cowl, for instance, smaller credit score agreements, the quantity of which is lower than 200 euros. Shoppers are additionally protected in relation to credit score contracts with none fees.
It needs to be famous, nevertheless, that the principles contained on this directive should be correctly transposed into the nationwide laws of the Member States by 25 November 2025, thereby permitting them loads of time to adapt. Nevertheless, till that date, the directive it’s supposed to interchange – Directive 2008/48/EC –, will proceed to use as the idea for shopper credit score contracts.
The purpose of the brand new directive, as set out in Article 1, is to harmonise the legal guidelines of the Member States in relation to credit score agreements. This directive improves the obligation to offer info to the buyer, in addition to implementing a ban on promoting that’s supposed to lure customers into taking out a mortgage by interesting to them to enhance their monetary scenario.
This prohibition is designed to forestall customers from taking out credit score with out there being an actual want to take action, thus defending the weakest social gathering on this contractual relationship.[12] As well as, all promoting for credit score merchandise should not be deceptive and should embrace a warning of the dangers and prices concerned in concluding a credit score settlement.[13]
In conclusion, the necessary info that should be publicised represents, so far as doable, all of the traits of the credit score settlement that could be granted by the creditor.[14]
Solvency evaluation
Analysing the creditworthiness of customers is essential with a purpose to adjust to the precept of accountable credit score[15] and that is the duty of credit score suppliers, as a rule.[16]
This precept implies that credit score establishments analyse the capability of customers and emphasises the transmission of truthful and clear info between the events, defending the weaker social gathering on this contractual relationship.[17]
It’s important that credit score establishments don’t signal credit score agreements with out assessing whether or not the credit score is protected, accountable and reasonably priced for the buyer. Then again, it’s the duty of the Member States to oversee credit score suppliers with a purpose to forestall such irresponsible lending from happening.
This obligation has two ranges of safety, that’s, the person degree, to the extent that it goals to guard the buyer by stopping irresponsible lending, which can result in non-compliance with contractual duties and, alternatively, the final degree, to the extent that it prevents severe harm to monetary organisations.[18] If credit score establishments fail to successfully analyse the solvency of every shopper, individually and on a case-by-case foundation, Member States are obliged to undertake the sanctions they deem essential to punish such inactivity.[19]
This want, which is key for shopper safety, is additional emphasised within the new directive. Thus, it’s famous that the solvency evaluation is carried out within the pursuits of the buyer, with a purpose to keep away from conditions of over-indebtedness, which have turn into more and more frequent.[20] To be able to research the buyer’s creditworthiness, private financial and monetary components should be taken into consideration, [21] with a purpose to analyse whether or not the buyer is anticipated to achieve success in fulfilling the credit score settlement in query.[22]
As soon as this has been achieved, credit score ought to solely be granted to customers who even have the monetary capability to fulfil the contract. To ensure that the evaluation of the buyer’s creditworthiness to cowl all of the related components, the creditor also needs to examine credit score databases to seek out out whether or not the buyer has taken out credit score with different organisations, beneath what phrases and whether or not there have been any defaults. Based mostly on frequent sense, it will not be helpful to enter into a brand new credit score settlement with a shopper who already has a big a part of their month-to-month finances allotted to paying off related obligations. Nevertheless, the evaluation of creditworthiness can’t be based mostly solely on the buyer’s credit score “document”.[23]
It needs to be famous that customers are usually not freed from duties, since they’ve the duty to make diligent and well-founded choices. As well as, they’re dedicated to at all times offering truthful info, particularly when it doesn’t exist in databases which might be appropriate for this objective.
In abstract, the brand new directive reinforces the necessity to inform customers accurately, in addition to to analyse their creditworthiness, in order that loans are taken out rationally and responsibly, with the purpose of avoiding non-compliance.
Non-compliance by credit score establishments
It quantities to credit score establishments[24] finishing up analyses of customers’ creditworthiness with a purpose to shield them from the dangers of over-indebtedness and insolvency. In response to the CJEU, this obligation helps to make sure that all customers within the Union are on the identical degree in relation to defending their rights, in addition to enabling the interior shopper credit score market to be efficient.[25]
If credit score establishments fail to analyse the buyer’s creditworthiness, it’s as much as the Member States to confirm this non-compliance and penalise it appropriately with a purpose to safeguard the buyer, with out prejudice to the buyer’s obligation to make rational and well-founded choices.[26]
The sanctions utilized by the Member States should be dissuasive, to the extent that monetary establishments really feel compelled to fulfil their obligation. If, in follow, the sanction established at nationwide degree will not be utilized or its software has irrelevant results, then it won’t have a preventive character.[27]
The CJEU lately emphasised[28] that if the monetary establishment has not fulfilled its obligation to analyse the buyer’s creditworthiness, and even when the contract has been fulfilled in full and with none prejudice to the borrower, the penalty nonetheless deserves to be utilized.
It needs to be famous that within the Portuguese authorized system, the sanction for non-compliance of this kind could be present in Article 30 of Decree-Regulation no. 133/2009, which solely signifies an administrative penalty. Now, for the reason that CJEU has thought-about[29] that the sanction of nullity of the credit score settlement, accompanied by the buyer’s obligation solely to return the principal to the creditor, is enough and dissuasive, it appears to us, by means of a comparative evaluation, that the sanction offered for in our authorized system will not be.
Conclusion
In view of the present social scenario, it’s essential to keep away from irresponsible credit score, because it contributes vastly to the financial and monetary disaster. Subsequently, along with stipulating ex publish options, similar to private insolvency, preventive options should be rethought and strengthened to keep away from conditions of shopper indebtedness and over-indebtedness.[30] Moreover, this won’t be sufficient if there is no such thing as a efficient supervision of the actions of credit score establishments by the competent our bodies.
Nevertheless, in follow, violations of the duty to analyse customers’ creditworthiness are frequent and we subsequently imagine it’s essential to strengthen monitoring, in any other case there might be an exponential improve in conditions the place customers default on credit score agreements as a result of they don’t have the monetary capability to fulfil them.
Then again, even when this management does exist, it should be matched by a sanction to dissuade establishments from fulfilling their obligation. Nevertheless, we realise that in Portugal there’s (in the intervening time) solely an administrative sanction in place for non-compliance with the obligations imposed on monetary establishments. We subsequently query whether or not this sanction is a ample dissuasive measure, in accordance with the CJEU’s judgment.[31]
[1] Judgment Nárokuj s.r.o. v EC Monetary Providers, a.s., 11 January 2024, case C‑755/22, ECLI:EU:C:2024:10.
[2] See, relating to the state of vulnerability of the buyer, Sandra Passinhas, “O lugar da vulnerabilidade no Direito do Consumidor português”, in Estudos de Direito do Consumidor, ed. António Monteiro (Coimbra: Centro de Direito do Consumo; Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Coimbra, 2019), 258.
[3] JO L 42 de 12.2.1987, 48.
[4] This info could be discovered within the Fee’s 1995 and 1996 experiences on the applying of Directive 87/102/EEC, out there at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/doc/A-4-1997-0010_PT.html and accessed on 23.12.2023.
[5] This concept stems from the Opinion of the Committee on the Atmosphere, Public Well being and Client Safety, annexed to the Report of the Committee on Authorized Affairs and the Citizen on the European Fee report on the applying of Directive 87/102/EEC (COM(95)0117 – C4 – 0185/95, 25.
[6] JO C 234, 30.9.2003.
[7] As said in Recital 9 of Directive 2008/48/EC, L 133 67.
[8] Up to date by Regulation no. 57/2020 of 28 August.
[9] Recital 6 of Directive 2023/2225.
[10] This Directive was pushed by the New Client Agenda (13 November 2020, Brussels, COM(2020) 696 closing), which emerged within the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, which highlighted weaknesses within the safety of shopper pursuits. This doc is obtainable at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0696 and was accessed on 24-01-2024.
[11] Pedro Madeira Froufe/José Caramelo Gomes, Mercado interno e concorrência, Alessandra Silveira/ Mariana Canotilho/Pedro Madeira Froufe (edos.), Direito da União Europeia. Elementos de Direito e Políticas da União (Edições Almedina, 2006), 460-461.
[12] Unfair and deceptive behaviour by firms is already regulated by Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 Might 2005, out there at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PT/TXT/?uri=celexpercent3A32005L0029 and accessed on 28-12-2023.
[13] Article 7 and Article 8(7)(a) of the CCC II.
[14] It also needs to be famous that though the earlier Directive already stipulated the obligation to offer pre-contractual info, this has been densified by the brand new legislation, altering the supply of the standardised info sheet (FIN).
[15] This precept was first enshrined within the Fee’s 2002 proposal for a Directive (out there at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2002:0443:FIN:PT:PDF and accessed on 23-01-2024) and determines that the creditor is obliged to analyse the buyer’s monetary capability in centralised databases with a purpose to assess whether or not or not they’re able to taking out the credit score responsibly.
[16] However the provisions on credit score threat, that are laid down in Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on entry to the exercise of credit score establishments and the prudential supervision of credit score establishments, OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, 338-436.
[17] See Cláudia Cristina Moreira Salazar, “Crédito responsável e dever de avaliação da solvabilidade do consumidor”, (Grasp’s diss., Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 2012), 17.
[18] José Engrácia Antunes, “Dos contratos de devour em especial”, Revista da Ordem dos Advogados, I-II (2018): 175, out there at https://portal.oa.pt/media/130213/jose-engracia-antunes_roa_i_ii-2018-revista-da-ordem-dos-advogados.pdf.
[19] This concept is current in each directives, in recital 26 of Directive 2008/48/EC and recital 53 of Directive 2023/2225.
[20] As could be seen from Article 18 of the DCD II, which is a part of Chapter V: evaluation of solvency and entry to the database.
[21] Respecting the precept of information minimisation enshrined within the Basic Knowledge Safety Regulation (GDPR), Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016.
[22] The brand new directive, making an allowance for the social evolution that has taken place, additionally supplies for the opportunity of the evaluation being carried out utilizing synthetic intelligence, in recital 56 and Article 18(8).
[23] As is said in Article 18(11) of the brand new directive.
[24] Credit score establishments correspond to the credit score grantor and, for the needs of this directive, correspond to pure or authorized individuals who, inside the scope of their business or skilled competences, grant or promise to grant a shopper credit score, as said in Article 3(2) of Directive 2023/2225.
[25] This concept could be discovered within the Radlinger and Radlingerová judgment, 21 April 2016, case C-377/14, EU:C:2016:283, recital 61.
[26] As said in recital 53 of Directive 2023/2225.
[27] On this regard, see judgment Dwelling Credit score Slovakia, 9 November 2016, case C-42/15, EU:C:2016:842, recital 62.
[28] Judgment Nárokuj s.r.o. v EC Monetary Providers, a.s., 11 January 2024, Case C-755/22, ECLI:EU:C:2024:10.
[29] Judgment OPR-Finance, recital 30.
[30] See Jorge Morais Carvalho, Guide de Direito do Consumo, 7th version (Almedina, 2020), 439.
[31] It’s price mentioning that there is no such thing as a document of those administrative offences being utilized to credit score establishments.
Image credit: by Cottonbro Studio on Pexels.com.
